AgentWeb vs TinyFish: which one should your agent use to get things done on websites?
Short answer. If your agent has to complete a known task on a real site, like place an Uber Eats order, book a SevenRooms table or send a LinkedIn InMail, use AgentWeb. AgentWeb calls one typed action with declared inputs and gets a structured result back, at $0.05 per completed action with failed actions refunded. TinyFish runs a goal-driven web agent that navigates the page step by step and bills per step, so the path and the cost can change from run to run.
At a glance
| AgentWeb | TinyFish | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web actions for AI agents: typed actions on mapped sites | "Infrastructure for AI web agents": a web agent plus cloud browsers |
| How a task runs | One call to a named action, like place_order | A natural-language goal that the agent works through page by page |
| What your agent gets back | A structured result for the action | The agent's output for the goal |
| The user's own accounts | Hosted sign-in. 1,115 maps run on the user's account. The agent never sees the password | A Vault that connects a password manager |
| Pricing | $0.05 per completed action, failed actions refunded | Agent $0.016 per step, Browser $0.002 per minute |
| Coverage | 1,462 mapped sites and 7,073 actions, listed at /sites/all | Any site the agent can navigate |
What AgentWeb is
AgentWeb is the execution layer for AI agents. Each site has an action map: named actions with declared inputs and a structured result. On Ryanair the agent builds a real booking with create_basket, add_one_way_flight and add_passengers. On DesignMyNight it books with book_table. The agent can check what a site supports with list_actions before it promises the user anything, and you only pay when the action completes.
What TinyFish is (one fair line)
TinyFish gives agents a capable goal-driven web agent and cloud browsers, which is useful for sites nobody has mapped yet and for one-off workflows.
Where TinyFish falls short for agents that have to act reliably
- The path changes every run. A goal-driven agent decides its clicks as it goes, so the same task can take a different route each time.
- Cost follows steps, not outcomes. At $0.016 per step, a run that wanders costs more, even if it doesn't finish. AgentWeb charges a flat $0.05 per completed action and refunds failures.
- No declared result. A goal returns what the agent concluded. A typed action returns the fields the action declares, like a reservation or an order, so your code can check it.
Which one should you pick?
- Pick AgentWeb when the task is on a site AgentWeb maps (check /sites/all or call
list_actions) and you need the same result every time, especially on the user's own account. - TinyFish fits a one-off workflow on a site that no one has mapped. If AgentWeb doesn't cover a site you need, request a map.
Frequently asked questions
Is AgentWeb a TinyFish alternative?
Yes, for tasks on sites AgentWeb maps. Instead of an agent finding its way through the page, your agent calls a named action and gets a structured result.
Which is cheaper?
It depends on the task. AgentWeb is $0.05 per completed action. TinyFish's agent is $0.016 per step, so the cost of a run depends on how many steps it takes.
Does AgentWeb work on the user's logged-in accounts?
Yes. 1,115 maps run on the user's own account through a hosted sign-in, as of Oct 20, 2026.
Related
- AgentWeb vs Context.dev
- AgentWeb vs Monid
- Browserbase alternatives for agents that need to get things done
- What is an action map?
AgentWeb is not affiliated with TinyFish. Product details change, so test your exact sites and tasks. Corrections: support@agentweb.us
Sources (accessed Oct 20, 2026)
- AgentWeb coverage: https://mcp.agentweb.us/api/sites and https://mcp.agentweb.us/maps/library/summary
- TinyFish positioning, Vault: https://www.tinyfish.ai/llms.txt
- TinyFish pricing: https://www.tinyfish.ai/pricing
More: Sites AgentWeb can act on · All guides · Glossary · Install AgentWeb